Reposted by Gary Marcus
Daniel Horowitz
@RMConservative
·
4d
The statement critiques the actions of a particular industry, suggesting that it relies on its size and influence to secure favorable policies, such as regulatory moratoriums and intellectual property rights abrogation. It implies that these actions are part of a broader strategy to mitigate risk by being 'Too Big to Fail.' The statement is critical of the industry's reliance on government support and suggests political influence by the AI lobby.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of industry practices, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the industry's strategies, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of industry practices without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight potential issues with industry practices, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly critiquing industry practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.