In reply to:
Zeno Vale
@AIRevolution1a
·
3d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
3d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the release of AI models and OpenAI's request for a backstop, which are relevant to ongoing discussions about the development and regulation of AI technologies. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification or transparency regarding the actions of AI companies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It simply questions the status of AI model releases and OpenAI's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue by questioning the actions of AI companies, but it does not provide constructive criticism or engage in personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by questioning and seeking transparency in AI development, using the platform responsibly to raise public concerns. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.