In reply to:
Parsa Assadi
@parsley9877
·
3d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
3d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the sustainability and future of the GenAI industry, engaging in a debate about market predictions and the validity of previous claims. The tone is critical and defensive, aiming to justify the original prediction and address criticisms.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is defensive and dismissive, which could be seen as slightly undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on defending a position rather than fostering a mutual understanding. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a defensive rebuttal rather than constructive criticism, dismissing the opposing argument without addressing it substantively. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.