Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
11/6/2025, 8:15:09 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
3d
my timing was a little bit off, but it looks like the gist of this was 100% correct.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
473d
Within 12 months, the GenAI bubble will have burst.
• The economics don’t work
• The current approach has reached a plateau
• There is no killer app
• Hallucinations remain
• Boneheaded errors remain
• Nobody has a moat
• People are starting to realize all of the above. https://x.com/GaryMarcus/status/…

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the future of Generative AI technology. The tone is defensive, aiming to justify the original prediction by emphasizing the correctness of the reasoning despite the timing being off.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by addressing the criticism received, but it does not constructively engage with the opposing views or provide further evidence to support the reasoning. It focuses on defending the original stance rather than fostering understanding or empathy. [-1]
  2. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges a mistake in timing, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. However, it does not fully explore or admit any potential errors in reasoning, which could enhance the discourse. [+1]