Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques the accuracy and reliability of certain pollsters by comparing them to Fox News, suggesting a lack of credibility. It presents specific polling data and contrasts it with the actual election outcome, implying that these pollsters consistently underperform or mislead.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could be seen as undermining the credibility of the pollsters mentioned. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of pollsters but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It uses data to support its critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing public figures and institutions, using data to substantiate claims, which aligns with responsible use of a platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.