The statement questions DTE's request to fast-track a data center project without public hearings, implying a lack of transparency and public engagement. It raises concerns about the public's ability to participate in the decision-making process.
- The statement does not directly harm but raises concerns about potential harm from lack of public engagement.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on a public issue rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the lack of public hearings, encouraging public engagement. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue by questioning DTE's motives, though it could be more constructive by suggesting solutions.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a public issue, encouraging civic engagement. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning a public decision. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.