Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/8/2025, 9:44:12 PM
X
In reply to:
Juergentron9000
@juergentron9000
·
45d
@GaryMarcus @peterevoss How does AGI not immediately solve everything, computational power being its only limitation?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
45d
@peterevoss true agi maybe but we also have a long way to go on the neuroscience, and true AGI doesn’t immediately solve that.
Peter Voss
@peterevoss
·
45d
@GaryMarcus Do you not believe true AGI is possible in less than 20 years? And the exponentially acceleration of technological progress thereafter?

Leaving aside what exactly such 'uploading' would actually entail and mean..
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
45d
20 years? no fucking way. so much BS.
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
46d
Elon Musk says,

Neuralink could capture an approximate snapshot of a person's mind and upload it to an Optimus (robot) body

It's not immediate, but it's possible and probably within 20 years

The statement engages in a discussion about the feasibility and timeline of achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It challenges the notion that AGI can solve all problems immediately, emphasizing the complexity and time required for scientific and technological advancements. The tone is analytical and aims to provide a realistic perspective on the limitations of intelligence and the execution of plans.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on a factual and analytical discussion about AGI timelines. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by explaining the complexities involved in scientific investigations and technological advancements. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a point of disagreement with a reasoned argument rather than personal attacks. [+1]