The statement is dismissive and uses strong language to criticize ChatGPT5, suggesting frustration with its performance. It reflects a broader conversation about AI reliability and public perception.
- The statement uses harsh language, which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The use of profanity and dismissive tone does not respect the dignity of the AI developers or users, potentially violating privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more focused on expressing frustration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, instead opting for a personal attack on the AI's capabilities. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.