Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 66
11/10/2025, 4:30:24 AM
X
In reply to:
Scott H
@ScottHamann9
·
48d
@marwilliamson Here's the most basic shift between your writings and your recent message that I would point out: A Return to Love had a very powerful message that societal transformation starts with personal awakening. It's not a message of anger or confrontation but compassion.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
48d
@ScottHamann9 Give me an example. Do you think because I fiercely resist an authoritarian takeover of our democracy that that makes me “bitter, angry and resentful?” Did you get from my books that I thought love could never say no? No spiritual path gives us a pass on addressing the
Scott H
@ScottHamann9
·
50d
@marwilliamson Serious question, Marianne: When did you lose touch with this part of yourself and become so bitter, angry, and resentful? I've read your books and loved them. Your persona has drifted far, far away from these messages.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
51d
So honored by this.
Oluwabunmi ||Omo Usen MJ
@AkinbinuadeLoye
·
51d
Posting this again because it carries such a deep message:
“Our greatest fear is not that we are inadequate, but that we are powerful beyond measure.” – Marianne Williamson 💫
It’s rarely about incapability; we often just struggle to accept how much possibility lives within us.

The statement addresses serious societal issues such as disappearances, trauma, and inhumane conditions, expressing compassion for those affected. It engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of authoritarian actions on individuals and society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aligns with the principle of doing no harm by expressing compassion for affected individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the suffering of marginalized groups. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a critique with a focus on compassion rather than confrontation. [+1]