Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 66

The statement involves a discussion about a public figure and their background, which can be considered public discourse. The conversation includes a request to verify information by checking a resume, which suggests an interest in factual accuracy. However, the initial statement by @paulsperry_ includes personal details and a potentially derogatory tone, which could be seen as an ad hominem attack.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The initial statement by @paulsperry_ could cause harm by making personal attacks based on ethnicity and family background, which violates the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The mention of personal details such as ethnicity and family background without clear relevance to public issues may violate privacy and dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation includes a request for factual verification, which aligns with constructive dialogue, but the initial statement's tone undermines this by focusing on personal attacks. [+1]