The Washington Times
@WashTimes
·
46d
The statement expresses a critical opinion on the policy of counting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day in certain states. It uses a strong tone, describing the situation as 'ridiculous,' which indicates a clear stance against the current practice.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a dismissive tone that could polarize the discussion. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the practice without considering the reasons behind it. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses a strong negative tone without offering solutions or engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.