Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and the referenced conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the dynamics within the AI community and the debate over the role of large language models in achieving human-level intelligence. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, suggesting a divide within the community and implying a cult-like mentality among AI proponents.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could contribute to a divisive atmosphere.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of those it criticizes, as it implies denial and cult-like behavior. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone and implies personal shortcomings rather than addressing the argument's substance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.