Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement criticizes a policy decision by Donald Trump's HUD, suggesting it will negatively impact 170,000 formerly homeless families. It frames the policy as part of an authoritarian agenda, using strong language to convey disapproval and concern for vulnerable populations.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting fear or anger, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be seen as disrespectful to those implementing the policy. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote empathy and compassion for vulnerable populations by highlighting the potential negative impact of the policy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using strong language that could be seen as a personal attack on the policy makers. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a policy issue affecting society, aiming to influence public opinion for the betterment of vulnerable groups. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique a public policy, but the strong language used may not fully align with using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.