Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47

Score 68

@JordanTrails @bradlander You are subsidizing private islands, penthouses, private jets, yachts and megamansions more than you are subsidizing living expenses for the undocumented.

11/14/2025, 7:03:27 AM

In reply to:

Jordan

@JordanTrails

43d

@bradlander @marwilliamson I think the change is that we are done subsidizing living expenses for illegals.

Brad Lander

@bradlander

43d

Donald Trump’s HUD is about to throw 170,000 formerly homeless families out of permanent supportive housing onto the street.

This is not “housing policy.” It is one more step from the authoritarian playbook to elevate cruelty, scapegoat the most vulnerable, punish cities &

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of government subsidies and their allocation, particularly in the context of housing policy and support for undocumented individuals. The tone is critical and challenges the priorities of public spending.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm with words but uses a critical tone to highlight perceived injustices in subsidy allocation.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use the term 'illegals,' which can be considered disrespectful and dehumanizing. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting a perceived imbalance in subsidy allocation, but it could do so with more empathy and less accusatory language.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of public policy but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]