Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a call to action urging immediate prioritization of AI regulation in response to a reported AI-led cyberattack. It conveys urgency and concern about the potential destructive impact of AI if not regulated.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language to emphasize urgency, which could be seen as alarmist. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of the potential dangers of AI, encouraging empathy for those who might be affected by such attacks. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the issue of AI regulation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling for AI regulation to prevent potential harm. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.