Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/14/2025, 4:46:52 PM
X
In reply to:
Peter Bowden
@PeterBowdenLive
·
44d
@GaryMarcus @fchollet Gary, do you have a specific talk you’d recommend for going deep into your thoughts on neuro symbolic AI?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
44d
holy shit, @elonmusk just retweeted @fchollet’s implicit endorsement of neurosymbolic AI (though I am not sure Musk fully understands what Chollet and I have been driving at).
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
44d
AI is compression and correlation

The statement is part of a conversation about AI, specifically neuro-symbolic AI, involving public figures in the tech industry. It references an essay and a discussion on AI concepts, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with a significant technological and societal issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a technical discussion.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by referencing an essay for deeper insight into AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by contributing to an ongoing conversation about AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss AI, a topic of public interest. [+1]