Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential impact of OpenAI's business challenges on the broader world. It suggests that the world would be unaffected if OpenAI were to fail, implying a critique of the company's significance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the potential consequences of a major company's failure. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards the complexities of business operations and their impact on employees and stakeholders. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be perceived as a personal attack on OpenAI's business strategy. [-1]