Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

@rohanpaul_ai i don’t at all see how is argument that there is no bubble.

rather what jensen said is part of why there IS a bubble: this stuff is ridiculously expensive to run, and margins are small. throw in the lack of reliability, and the edifice makes no sense.

11/15/2025, 3:27:55 PM

In reply to:

Rohan Paul

@rohanpaul_ai

44d

Jensen Huang explains the difference between AI and traditional Software and why there's no bubble.

Traditional software was pre-compiled, meaning it was built once, stored, and then executed repeatedly with little computation. It didn’t need constant high-power processing once

The statement engages in a discussion about the economic sustainability of AI, challenging the notion that there is no bubble in the industry. It critiques the high costs and low margins associated with AI, suggesting these factors contribute to a bubble.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing an argument rather than individuals. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by providing a counterpoint to the original argument, encouraging further discussion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the argument's content rather than attacking the individual. [+1]