Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of hallucinations in language models, a topic relevant to AI development and its societal impact. The tone is somewhat skeptical, suggesting that hallucinations are an inherent part of LLMs, while the conversation from OpenAI expresses optimism about reducing them.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to misunderstanding if taken as a definitive claim about LLMs. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a skeptical view without acknowledging ongoing efforts to improve LLM accuracy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses the possibility of improvement without engaging with the optimistic view presented by OpenAI. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.