In reply to:
The statement is part of a conversation about the contributions of AI researchers, specifically comparing the work of Schmidhuber and LeCun. It engages in a public discourse about the history and contributions in the field of AI, which is a public issue of interest to the scientific community and beyond.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It presents an opinion on the contributions of AI researchers without using harmful language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by discussing the contributions of Schmidhuber and LeCun. However, it could be seen as indirectly supporting a dismissive tone towards LeCun's work, which might not fully align with constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.