Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement references a conversation about the direction of AI development, specifically critiquing the focus on large language models. This is a substantive engagement with a public issue, as it addresses concerns within the field of AI, which has significant societal implications.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of current AI trends, which could be seen as a constructive warning.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by aligning with others who share concerns about AI development, fostering a dialogue on the topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI trends without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss a significant public issue, contributing to the discourse on AI ethics and development. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.