In reply to:
gorimakpa
@elomoyika
·
36d
The statement is part of a conversation about the origins of ideas related to artificial intelligence, specifically convolutional neural networks and AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). It challenges a previous claim about the attribution of these ideas to Jurgen Schmidhuber, suggesting that the claim is incorrect. The tone is corrective and factual, aiming to clarify a potential misunderstanding in the discussion.
- The statement does not use harmful language and is focused on correcting a perceived inaccuracy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point of disagreement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly acknowledges the importance of correcting misinformation, though it does not explicitly acknowledge any personal mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.