In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
36d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
87d
The statement addresses a significant public issue regarding data security and transparency, particularly focusing on the Washington Post's handling of a data breach. It questions the delay in determining the extent of the data stolen and the lack of response to requests for comment, implying a need for accountability and transparency.
- The statement highlights a potential harm caused by the data breach and the lack of timely communication, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for better practices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the Washington Post's response, the statement respects the privacy and dignity of those affected by the breach, urging for transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of the Washington Post without resorting to personal attacks, thus promoting accountability. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.