Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes a recent decision by the UN Security Council, describing it as a 'horrific US resolution' and a 'US-Israel colonial outrage.' The tone is strongly negative and accusatory, suggesting a deep disapproval of the resolution and the actions of the Security Council members.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting anger or hostility. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use harsh language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily focused on expressing outrage and criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses accusatory language and does not offer a reasoned argument or alternative perspective. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or constructive, given its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.