Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on the role of the United States and the United Nations Security Council in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It uses strong language to accuse the US of being a 'co-perpetrator' of genocide and criticizes the UN Security Council's decision-making. The tone is accusatory and seeks to highlight perceived injustices in international politics.
- The statement uses strong and potentially inflammatory language, which could be seen as harmful, particularly if it incites further division or hostility. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech directly, but the use of the term 'genocide' is a serious accusation that could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of those involved, particularly if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a strong accusatory stance without offering a path to dialogue or resolution. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without engaging with opposing viewpoints or offering a constructive path forward. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity, given the serious nature of the accusations without providing evidence or context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.