The statement critiques the actions of the UN Security Council, suggesting it supports perpetrators of genocide rather than victims, and references a broader discussion on international policy regarding Gaza. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived injustices in international governance.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to those involved in the UN's decision-making process. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering solutions or fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but lacks constructive criticism or dialogue, focusing instead on a broad accusation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived injustices, which could be seen as an effort to better society by drawing attention to important issues. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique international policy, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the accusatory tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.