Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
87d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
35d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
35d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
35d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
35d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
35d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of digital IDs, data privacy, and the influence of think tanks on public policy. It raises concerns about the use of digital IDs to control migration and questions the integrity of the polling used to support such policies.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm from digital IDs, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the integrity of polling and the influence of think tanks, which could be seen as respecting the privacy and dignity of others, but it also risks spreading unverified claims. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of public figures and organizations, but it lacks constructive dialogue and could be seen as an ad hominem attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.