Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The conversation involves a debate on the plausibility of ambitious scientific claims, touching on public discourse about scientific progress and skepticism.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The initial statement by @GaryMarcus is dismissive and could be seen as harsh, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    @matthewputman’s response encourages a more supportive and constructive approach, promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue involves constructive criticism, though @GaryMarcus’s tone could be more respectful to avoid personal attacks.