Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The conversation involves a discussion about AI companies and their strategies, with some playful banter and criticism. The statement about muting someone suggests a personal boundary being set in response to perceived negativity or disagreement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement about muting does not cause harm but indicates a personal choice to avoid potential negativity. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    Respecting privacy and dignity is maintained as the action of muting is a personal decision without public shaming. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue includes playful ribbing, which can be seen as constructive criticism, but the decision to mute suggests a limit to engagement.