In reply to:
Max Murray
@MaxMurrayTweets
·
36d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
36d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the deployment of the National Guard in Memphis, a public issue involving law enforcement and government intervention. The tone is critical and questions the decision-making process regarding law enforcement strategies.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on questioning policy decisions, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the rationale behind bypassing local law enforcement, encouraging a discussion on effective solutions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the decision to deploy the National Guard, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning a public policy decision, contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.