Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement expresses skepticism about Google's claim regarding their AI model, Gemini 3. It uses informal and somewhat dismissive language, referring to the claim as 'snake oil.' While it acknowledges the release as 'great,' it criticizes the marketing language used.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses dismissive language, which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, though it does not directly attack individuals. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the tone could be more respectful.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement offers criticism but lacks constructive elements and uses informal language that could be perceived as a personal attack on the credibility of the claim. [-1]