Jake Tapper

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 130

The statement addresses a significant public issue involving international relations, human rights, and accountability for the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. It highlights a discrepancy between the US President's remarks and the findings of the US intelligence community, which has implications for public trust and foreign policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as downplaying a serious human rights violation, which may indirectly cause harm by undermining accountability. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it could be seen as dismissive of the victim's dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it appears to dismiss the gravity of the situation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a narrative that contradicts intelligence findings without addressing the discrepancy. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence in a way that could be seen as protecting a foreign leader rather than advocating for justice and accountability. [-2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform responsibly by potentially spreading misinformation or downplaying a serious issue. [-1]