Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/19/2025, 12:34:22 AM
X
In reply to:
James Dunn
@JamesDunn9
·
18d
@GaryMarcus This feels like the people arguing that Darwin wasn’t the first to think of evolution… You get credit for being an early key player. Don’t nit pick. It looks like sour grapes.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
18d
Why I find Yann LeCun to be dishonest and unscholarly, with receipts.

Lots and lots of receipts.

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a critique of a public figure's scholarly contributions. The tone is defensive, aiming to clarify the accuracy of reported facts. The intent is to address a challenge to the credibility of the critique.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on factual accuracy rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, though the broader conversation includes strong criticism. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the factual basis of the critique rather than resorting to ad hominem arguments. [+1]