+4
lower_voting_age
@lower_votingage
·
18d
The statement discusses the performance and reliability of AI models, specifically Gemini 3 compared to GPT 5 or 5.1, highlighting issues with hallucinations and inconsistency. The image shows an acknowledgment of these issues and suggests a technical solution. The tone is critical yet constructive, aiming to address and improve the AI's performance.
- The statement and image acknowledge the harm caused by AI hallucinations and seek to address it, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The response in the image promotes understanding and empathy by accepting criticism and explaining the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the AI's performance. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The image shows acknowledgment of mistakes and suggests a corrective action, aligning with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.