Gary Marcus

The statement critiques the lack of concrete federal AI legislation and suggests that current efforts are aimed at avoiding accountability. It reflects a concern for public opinion and accountability in AI governance.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight a perceived issue in AI legislation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for accountability. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of legislative efforts, though it could be more specific in its suggestions.