Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
Brian Schwartz
@schwartzbWSJ
·
5d
The statement raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest involving the president's son and his business dealings, drawing parallels to similar concerns during the Biden administration. It questions the ethics of including business figures with interests in White House events, suggesting a need for transparency and accountability.
- The statement does not directly harm others but raises ethical concerns about potential conflicts of interest.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and their professional actions rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of potential ethical issues in government-business relations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the ethics of the situation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight potential ethical issues, contributing to societal betterment by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing public concerns about government ethics. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.