Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 83
11/19/2025, 7:27:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Steadtler
@SteadtlerA58435
·
27d
@GaryMarcus Nvidia's lead isn't in the silicon, its in the software. 75% of Nvidia's engineers do software.

Google is not interested in starting to support software feature requirest from his competitors.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
27d
Hot take on Gemini 3. Points 4 and 5 might literally change the world. Also, OpenAI is in trouble.

• Great model, but it’s not AGI; has the same kind of problems all earlier models have had. Hallucinations and unreliability persist.

• In short, scaling isn’t getting us to
Jen Zhu
@jenzhuscott
·
28d
Wait, Gemini 3 was trained on TPUs?!

The statement engages in a discussion about the competitive landscape of AI technology, specifically focusing on Nvidia's software capabilities. It acknowledges the importance of Nvidia's frameworks and suggests monitoring their developments. The tone is analytical and supportive, contributing to a broader conversation about AI advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is respectful in its acknowledgment of Nvidia's contributions. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by highlighting the significance of software in AI development. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages constructively by agreeing with a point and suggesting further observation. [+1]