In reply to:
Talia Ringer 🕊
@TaliaRinger
·
29d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
30d
The statement is a response to a discussion about media coverage and personal experiences with a public figure. It suggests that the original commenter has not experienced being a target, implying a lack of understanding of the issue. The tone is dismissive and somewhat confrontational.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the other person's perspective without constructive engagement. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it implies a lack of understanding without offering empathy or a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead makes a personal remark that could be seen as an ad hominem argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.