Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the current state of AI development, suggesting that the initial promises of AI's capabilities have not been fully realized. It implies a disparity between expectations and reality, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue related to technology and its societal impact.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a critical yet neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the gap between AI expectations and reality, encouraging a more informed public discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI industry's promises versus outcomes, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to critique a significant public issue, contributing to the dialogue on AI's societal impact. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.