In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
30d
The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate on expertise and credibility in the field of neural networks. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, focusing on a perceived lack of disclosure about employment, which is relevant to the discussion of bias and transparency.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses a confrontational tone and implies wrongdoing without evidence, potentially harming reputations. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a form of public shaming and could be seen as cyberbullying. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on a personal attack rather than addressing the substantive issues of the debate. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.