Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a conversation that involves accusations and criticisms related to expertise and credibility in the field of neural networks. It engages in a public debate about qualifications and the right to critique, which can be considered public discourse as it touches on issues of expertise and public commentary.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses someone of lying, which can be harmful and does not strive to do no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harassing, as it accuses someone of lying without providing evidence. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the substance of the disagreement. [-2]