Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate on expertise and criticism in the field of neural networks. The tone is confrontational, with a focus on defending one's reputation against perceived defamation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement threatens legal action, which could be seen as harmful if used to silence legitimate criticism, but it is also a response to perceived harm from defamation.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does involve a public accusation of lying, which could impact the dignity of the other party.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on a legal threat rather than addressing the content of the disagreement.聽[-2]