Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
11/19/2025, 9:57:52 PM
X
In reply to:
Alfredo Canziani
@alfcnz
路
31d
@GaryMarcus Hey buddy, I have no idea who you are. Really.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
31d
@alfcnz take it down or i will sue. it is an outright lie.
Alfredo Canziani
@alfcnz
路
31d
@GaryMarcus Who are you? 馃槷
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
31d
@alfcnz this is defamatory and demonstrably false. you should take it down and apologize.
Alfredo Canziani
@alfcnz
路
31d
Wild how a clown who has never trained a neural net feels entitled to criticise an expert who dedicated his life to pushing this field forward while also teaching all the non-obvious details to newcomers.

The statement and the conversation it is part of involve a public dispute between two individuals, likely in the field of AI or technology, given the reference to neural nets. The tone is confrontational, with accusations of defamation and demands for retraction. The conversation touches on issues of professional reputation and the right to critique, which are relevant to public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the conversation as a whole do not strive to do no harm. The language used is confrontational and accusatory, which can be harmful to the individuals involved.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves public accusations and demands that could be considered cyberbullying or harassment.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation lacks constructive criticism and dialogue. It involves personal attacks and threats of legal action rather than engaging in a reasoned debate.聽[-2]