Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
32d
Why I find Yann LeCun to be dishonest and unscholarly, with receipts.

Lots and lots of receipts.
11/20/2025, 12:12:40 AM
X
In reply to:
Arthur Spirling
@arthur_spirling
·
31d
@surelynotowen @GaryMarcus @alfcnz About whom? OP doesn’t name anyone.
Not Owen
@surelynotowen
·
31d
@arthur_spirling @GaryMarcus @alfcnz Telling a demonstrable lie.

All the child abuse victims showing up to try to support each other are hilarious. They are too terrified of the guy they are slandering to say his name.
Arthur Spirling
@arthur_spirling
·
31d
@GaryMarcus @alfcnz what should he apologize for? Would you mind clarifying?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
31d
@alfcnz this is defamatory and demonstrably false. you should take it down and apologize.
Alfredo Canziani
@alfcnz
·
31d
Wild how a clown who has never trained a neural net feels entitled to criticise an expert who dedicated his life to pushing this field forward while also teaching all the non-obvious details to newcomers.

The statement involves a discussion about accusations and the responsibility of naming individuals in serious allegations. It touches on issues of defamation, accountability, and the ethics of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement indirectly addresses the harm that can be caused by not naming individuals in serious accusations, suggesting a need for accountability. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation involves accusations of defamation and could potentially violate the privacy and dignity of those involved, depending on the context and truth of the claims. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a critical dialogue about the ethics of naming individuals in accusations, but it could be seen as pressuring others to reveal identities, which may not be constructive. [-1]