Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/20/2025, 1:48:40 AM
X
In reply to:
Nihilist
@NewAgeNihilism
·
30d
@GaryMarcus STFU retard
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
30d
America will regret this. 99 Senators across both parties rejected an earlier version of it.

It will leave our children and mentally ill vulnerable.

It may end privacy as we know it.

It will escalate the chance of uncontrollable and unaligned AI.

And it will set a precedent
Shakeel
@ShakeelHashim
·
30d
EXCLUSIVE — here's the full draft executive order on AI preemption.

@ReadTransformer is publishing the full text for anyone to read.

The statement 'always with the carefully considered counterarguments' is sarcastic and dismissive, responding to a previous offensive comment. The initial comment by @NewAgeNihilism is a personal attack and does not engage constructively with the serious concerns raised by @GaryMarcus about the AI executive order. The discourse involves public issues related to AI policy and governance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The initial comment by @NewAgeNihilism violates the principle of doing no harm with words, as it uses offensive language. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The offensive language used by @NewAgeNihilism disrespects the privacy and dignity of others, constituting a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The sarcastic reply does not promote understanding or empathy, though it attempts to highlight the lack of constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The initial comment fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, resorting to personal attacks instead. [-2]