Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 83
11/20/2025, 2:17:22 AM
X
In reply to:
moderate rock
@lookoutitsbbear
·
29d
@GaryMarcus and if you had just shut the fuck up nobody would have known

this is not an actionable case

grow up
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
@lookoutitsbbear that defense definitely won’t fly where i live, when half a million people read my tweet and or article immediate before the defamatory tweet was posted.
moderate rock
@lookoutitsbbear
·
29d
@GaryMarcus they’re gonna tell you that you weren’t mentioned by name so there’s no reasonable case
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
Seeking a New York based defamation lawyer for an open-and-shut case.

The statement involves a heated exchange about a potential defamation case, with accusations of malice and intent to harm. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, with personal attacks and a lack of constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of doing no harm with words, as it includes accusations of malice and intent to harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, engaging in a personal attack. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, opting instead for dismissive and confrontational language. [-2]