Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47

|

Score 83

-1

@Jayseki timing relative to viral tweets, among other things. but i don’t feel the need to explain my whole case to you.

11/20/2025, 2:27:39 AM

In reply to:

Private Tier

@Jayseki

·

28d

@GaryMarcus since that part is so blatantly not true, what makes you think the tweet referred to you at all?

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

·

28d

@Jayseki it claims i never trained a neural network when i have (among other things) a published, widely-cited single author article that did exactly that, all models trained and tested by me. and ffs i ran (and sold) an ml company.

it’s simply a lie. no basis in reality.

Private Tier

@Jayseki

·

28d

@GaryMarcus even assuming the tweet definitely, no-question refers to you, what's the factual matter that it gets wrong? as far as i can tell, it's just insulting, not inaccurate

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

·

28d

Seeking a New York based defamation lawyer for an open-and-shut case.

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate about the accuracy of claims made on social media, potentially involving defamation. The tone is defensive and dismissive, indicating a reluctance to engage further in the discussion.

Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it dismisses the need to explain further, which could be seen as avoiding constructive engagement. [-1]