Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 83
11/20/2025, 3:14:43 AM
X
In reply to:
Talia Ringer 馃晩
@TaliaRinger
路
26d
@GaryMarcus I was being genuine there, he seems like a terrible person and I'd be grumpy for life if I had to get a PhD under him
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
26d
@TaliaRinger wow that is really low and ad hominem and irrelevant and beneath you.
Talia Ringer 馃晩
@TaliaRinger
路
26d
@GaryMarcus Wow advised by Steven Pinker, that must have been miserable, no wonder you are often generally unhappy
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
26d
Every now and then some moron makes me flex. This guy got 10k views by lying outright about me and leaves me no choice.

I often remind clowns (his word) of my PhD from MIT when I was 23, my tenure at NYU 30, my six books, publications in Science and Nature, or the machine
Alfredo Canziani
@alfcnz
路
26d
Wild how a clown who has never trained a neural net feels entitled to criticise an expert who dedicated his life to pushing this field forward while also teaching all the non-obvious details to newcomers.

The statement is part of a broader conversation involving public figures and touches on issues of mentorship, politics, and personal attacks, which can be considered public discourse. The tone is reflective and somewhat defensive, aiming to provide a personal perspective on a controversial figure.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and provides a balanced view of the mentor, acknowledging differences in political views without attacking the person.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the mentor by focusing on professional experiences rather than personal attacks.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by sharing a personal experience that counters a negative portrayal, without resorting to ad hominem attacks.聽[+1]