Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/20/2025, 3:24:44 AM
X
In reply to:
AM Pines
@AM_Pines
·
25d
@A_Human_Future @GaryMarcus How about we don't wait for courts on this one, champ?
A Human Future ⏹️⏸️
@A_Human_Future
·
25d
@GaryMarcus It's blatantly unconstitutional and should be struck down by the courts.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
25d
America will regret this. 99 Senators across both parties rejected an earlier version of it.

It will leave our children and mentally ill vulnerable.

It may end privacy as we know it.

It will escalate the chance of uncontrollable and unaligned AI.

And it will set a precedent
Shakeel
@ShakeelHashim
·
25d
EXCLUSIVE — here's the full draft executive order on AI preemption.

@ReadTransformer is publishing the full text for anyone to read.

The statement is part of a public discourse about a draft executive order on AI policy. It suggests that someone should apologize and retract a false statement, which implies a call for accountability and correction of misinformation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes accountability, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by correcting misinformation. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by suggesting a non-confrontational resolution through apology and retraction. [+1]
  3. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    It encourages acknowledging and correcting mistakes, aligning with the principle of admitting errors. [+1]