Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
11/20/2025, 4:02:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Talia Ringer 🕊
@TaliaRinger
·
21d
@GaryMarcus I'll look it up tomorrow, no worries
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
21d
@TaliaRinger times literary supplement, uk

send me your email i and will send the pdf
Talia Ringer 🕊
@TaliaRinger
·
21d
@GaryMarcus TLS?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
21d
@TaliaRinger can you please read my TLS review where i did exactly that?

(but no i didn’t critique Karen Hao.)
Talia Ringer 🕊
@TaliaRinger
·
22d
OK can you guys please dedicate even half the energy you collectively use critiquing Empire of AI to also critique the massive work of harmful pseudoscience by Yud and Soares that was also a NYT Bestseller

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with the topic of AI and its societal implications, referencing a broader discussion on AI's future and critiques of influential works in the field. The tone is inquisitive and seeks to further the conversation by pointing to additional resources.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, simply pointing to additional information.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By linking to a resource, the statement promotes understanding and encourages further exploration of the topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks and maintains a focus on the topic rather than individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to responsibly share information relevant to public discourse on AI. [+1]